cheaters?
Sort:
In a political debate, for example it is used. It is considered low bow.
In chess, many years ago, a friend of mine was playing with a superior opponent.
He wins the game because he said to a boy tell to the opponrnt that there was someone trying to steal his bicycle. The opponent lost all concentration and lost the game.
Yes, I am also trying to help. We are sorry if you had your feelings hurt.
Ayy bro he closed his account??
Anyone would explain me wats goin on??
Read page 1.
Oh yeah I understand that
But he should nt close his acc
Dudes Gonna Be disowned by the russian chess federation
Pan_troglodites wrote:
Well, lets considere somethings.
This is an argument ad hominen.Ad hominem (Latin for 'to the person'), short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, some but not all of which are fallacious.
Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.The most common form of ad hominem is "A makes a claim x, B asserts that A holds a property that is unwelcome, and hence B concludes that argument x is wrong". (Wikipedia).
People need to learn what an Ad Hominen actually is, its pretty weak, this guy actually provides a definition yet he still can not reason that asking, is NOT and ad hominem. Even insults are not Ad Hominem, To make an Ad Hominem you need to be claiming about the individual who made the argument you are trying to counter, simply asking if someone, or some group is cheater, is just a question, its not an Ad Hominem, its pretty embarrassing this guy can figure that simple thing out.
Bye everyone I'm leavin'