♟️ Chess Conspiracy: The Game Is Rigged. The Truth Is Coming Out... 🕵️‍♂️ RED PILL 💊

SriyoTheGreat - "space agencies" are compartmentalized -

only a very few at the top know what's really going on.

there are conspiracy theories and there are conspiracy facts - only the individual can decide for themselves which is which -

these "space agencies" only thrive & survive if they all work together -

one falls and they all could fall.

There we go, you said it yourself. Facts are backed by proof, it would be great if you provided some, because as far as I can see there are none.

if Nasa is faking "outer space adventures" then every other space agency is doing likewise -

would you agree with that SriyoTheGreat?

Ah, perfect. Denial with a dash of resignation or maybe a kind of accidental Stoicism.

It's like saying, "The ship isnt sinking, but if it were, I’m sure drowning would build character."

You don’t see any problems because that’s exactly how it's supposed to be.
The best illusion is the one that convinces you there was nothing strange to see in the first place.

And maybe that's real Stoicism - not in conquering fear, but in genuinely not noticing when you're already underwater.

Also, you are trying to pull me off topic. I provided a list of undeniable truths, and then drew conclusions, and these conclusions disproved the flat earth.

1. The moon does not rotate on a specific relative axis

As previously mentioned, this is easily provable and is fact.

2. Changing latitude makes moon appear to rotate on that axis

Observable, fact

3. Therefore changing latitude makes me rotate

Only possible explanation, if it's not the moon rotating then it must be the observer of the rotation

4. Therefore "Latitude Change" = "Rotation"

Obvious, simply adapting from 3. This can be translated out of logic-speak to be "THE EARTH IS CURVED

Undeniable proof that the earth is curved! I'd love to see a similarly-formatted proof of flat-earth.

Why in the world did noodles get us talking about the Moon. 😭🙏😭🙏

he does not know lots of things

Hypothetically yes, but every conspiracy "fact" has either been from a very unreliable source or debunked.

RCP - you cannot prove the moon rotates nor can you prove the earth rotates - those are assumption. Why does the moon appear sideways , upside down , and every other way dependent upon the location of the observer - yet the exact same face of the moon is observed by everyone - is that what you are basing your "curvature" conclusions upon ?

Never did I say the moon rotates, neither did I say the earth rotates. You have nothing to refute and thus you create strawmen.

SriyoTheGreat - indeed - so-called "damage control" is off the charts - up to the individual to do their own research/investigations and try to avoid "confirmation biases" simply because they want to believe something like "man rode around in dune buggies playing golf on the moon" 50 years ago etc.

RCP - okay sorry - I thought you were trying to prove you were spinning Lost in Space !

I was trying (and you will not see any failure) only to prove that the earth is a ball. Spinning balls flying through space come later.

RCP - if you prove heliocentric theory you'd be the first human in the history of the world to do so.

and remember , not long ago, they decided the earth was not a ball/sphere but was a pear-shaped oblate spheroid

I'm not a scientist so distinguishing between sphere and slightly-pearlike-sphere does not matter to me. With heliocentrism, if we're purely talking about either the sun or earth being the center, most things like seasons and day and night and the solar system look better in a heliocentric model. Can't think of a proof today all my energy to think went into that round-earth proof. Heliocentrism is where it becomes harder for the average Joe to properly prove stuff, if I had a good telescope that told me how much it zoomed in then I could prove stuff, but I don't have one and I don't really care what's going on in outer space unless a meteor is going to obliterate us.

don't fret - Nasa has already proclaimed to be asteroid destroyers

This totally pointless. No point of arguing Fischer guy. All are not true, bs, and chess is not rigged. You're fighting a losing battle here and a weird hill to die on tbh.