I’m bored of this…

Sort:
Oldest
JustARandomDudeOnCC

So, after @epic-doge made a forum about him becoming an ‘NM’ I had to make this.

What’s the prob Kitty?

HERE’S THE THING

So many people are saying ‘I’m an NM, CM, GM, IM, FM, blah blah’

Some people like me tell them not to lie

BUT THEY JUST CALL US NAMES

It ain’t fair

So, here’s my FIX

If they have a rating lower than 2000 or atleast 1800, chesscom bans them for sandbagging 

Cuz they rnt playing like a master, but calling the truth-sayers names.

I think this should serve them right.

Some people show, Roman Numerals, and accept that they’re joking, that’s FUNNY

But these guys who am talking about say that we’re dumb for saying THE TRUTH?!

C’mom this isn’t fair

SO, I say that chess.com should take these actions.

Thx for hearing my rant.

RedCuteBallet

ooohooo

JustARandomDudeOnCC
epic-doge wrote:

Blah blah blah, nobody believes you

Lol, let’s see about that kiddo

Anonymous_Dragon

Lmfao @epic-doge really said he was an NM ? Lmao he would get pooped on easily . He's miles away from being at the master level

Anonymous_Dragon
epic-doge wrote:

Oh yeah? I have more rating than you think in other websites.

Everybody has a higher rating on other sites kiddo . That's because those sites use a different elo system. 

DrNykterstein
epic-doge wrote:

I dont play much here

give us proof you faker 

Anonymous_Dragon
epic-doge wrote:

Bye you sussy baka

Take the L you loser . You will probably get adopted by me or infact even a 1300 unless you decide to turn on the engine. So stop lying and get a life

Fidesia
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
epic-doge wrote:

Bye you sussy baka

Take the L you loser . You will probably get adopted by me or infact even a 1300 unless you decide to turn on the engine. So stop lying and get a life

Anonymous_Dragon is right...

Anonymous_Dragon
Zinc-Man wrote:

Just want to add a word of caution. I personally know a couple of chess.com members as I;ve played them couple of times. One Douglas, is a much better player than I am over the board and his grade shows this, yet on the site he is usually graded about 100 points lower than me?

The reason is that he uses the site to experiment and has no interest in what grade it gives him. So is capable of beating 1800's and losing to 1200's.

Yeah we are well aware of that . But this is certainly not one of those cases . You can look at his profile and his games and judge for yourself

eCarry_zzz
#6
We know that youre not a kid, youre a baby, and they tend to be dumbasses
Yurinclez2

watching heated debates is more fun

Snadow_w

@OpenJoyfulkitty, I agree.

Anonymous_Dragon
Zinc-Man wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Zinc-Man wrote:

Just want to add a word of caution. I personally know a couple of chess.com members as I;ve played them couple of times. One Douglas, is a much better player than I am over the board and his grade shows this, yet on the site he is usually graded about 100 points lower than me?

The reason is that he uses the site to experiment and has no interest in what grade it gives him. So is capable of beating 1800's and losing to 1200's.

Yeah we are well aware of that . But this is certainly not one of those cases . You can look at his profile and his games and judge for yourself

Wonder how well Anonymous Dragon understands English.

Enough to understand what your point was 

Snadow_w
epic-doge wrote:

Blah blah blah, nobody believes you

Bro what the f**** are you talking about? You are 700 blitz and 500 rapid.

JustARandomDudeOnCC
valcteicksstrhibrid wrote:
#6
We know that youre not a kid, youre a baby, and they tend to be dumbasses

I do agree, but please no bad words…

JustARandomDudeOnCC
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Zinc-Man wrote:
Anonymous_Dragon wrote:
Zinc-Man wrote:

Just want to add a word of caution. I personally know a couple of chess.com members as I;ve played them couple of times. One Douglas, is a much better player than I am over the board and his grade shows this, yet on the site he is usually graded about 100 points lower than me?

The reason is that he uses the site to experiment and has no interest in what grade it gives him. So is capable of beating 1800's and losing to 1200's.

Yeah we are well aware of that . But this is certainly not one of those cases . You can look at his profile and his games and judge for yourself

Wonder how well Anonymous Dragon understands English.

Enough to understand what your point was 

Bruhh Dragon is right sad.png

JustARandomDudeOnCC
Yurinclez2 wrote:

watching heated debates is more fun

😎😂

JustARandomDudeOnCC
SNADOWBLACKMILL wrote:
epic-doge wrote:

Blah blah blah, nobody believes you

Bro what the f**** are you talking about? You are 700 blitz and 500 rapid.

My question exactly….

Snadow_w
OpenJoyfulKitty wrote:
Yurinclez2 wrote:

watching heated debates is more fun

😎😂

lol.

JustARandomDudeOnCC
epic-doge wrote:

You're also a kid

Though I am, I’m sure that I act more mature than ya do.

Forums
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic