...
My hand fractured
Sort:
::$'$--=':
...
When looking at the variable of injured hands, your equation is true, as DarkAlpha and the sister of ChesswithNickolay are in the same boat.
But the equation is quadratic having two answers, because the proof (DA-sis=0, therefore DA=sis) equates whether or not the are the same person assuming equality is determined by personhood and not the true/false Boolean of an individual hand’s injured state.
But the equation is quadratic having two answers, because the proof (DA-sis=0, therefore DA=sis) equates whether or not the are the same person assuming equality is determined by personhood and not the true/false Boolean of an individual hand’s injured state.
ChesswithNickolay wrote:
HaughtyBishop wrote:
When looking at the variable of injured hands, your equation is true, as DarkAlpha and the sister of ChesswithNickolay are in the same boat.
But the equation is quadratic having two answers, because the proof (DA-sis=0, therefore DA=sis) equates whether or not the are the same person assuming equality is determined by personhood and not the true/false Boolean of an individual hand’s injured state.
But the equation is quadratic having two answers, because the proof (DA-sis=0, therefore DA=sis) equates whether or not the are the same person assuming equality is determined by personhood and not the true/false Boolean of an individual hand’s injured state.
Can you please talk English in the forums?
I think it makes perfect sense
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
It is interesting to think how a person write on mobile when his hand is broken
Voice type exists