I know!!!!!!!!!
Russell should have won survivor!

Natalie friggen sucks, she did nothing except hop on russells back, i aint watching this show ever again, no1 worthful ever wins.. its always a person who does nothing throughout the whole show, its B.S.
okay maybe ill watch the Hero's Vs. The Villian but thats it (Tbh i hope russells not in it.. everyone whos gonna be in that survivor knows russells plan and everyone will gun for russell), but i do have a feeling Shambo's gonna be in it.

Totally agreed. Nobody else won this year. HE won. PERIOD. I was a little (okay, real) disgusted that the do-nothing bimbo won.
GO RUSSELL! :)

look you serbag you better watch because you no you love it. Plus it would be boring if you knew how the vote will come out everytime. plus you were conditioned to believe russ would win. in all the other jurys they vote for the best player but it could have worked out the other way were there all crybabies and voted against the person that got them off the island. then you would have just thought oh russel could not win...then he does! ha this is a alternate universe where i have never lost a live chess game with you.
Watch because it will still be there getting good ratings. russel should have won though...but he did. he won 200k, and should always be know as the best. I think he will be voted off fast though in the villians one. hell maybe just because the other will be jealouse and want more air time.
Of course he would be voted off fast.
And he only won 100k.
He got the best player award so thats better then the sole survivor prize..... i guess...
But still... i just hate how the jury votes on hatred.. like in Big Brother, they voted on who played the best in the end, and Jordan did (even though she did nothing as well throughout the whole thing.. but in the end she showed herself that she was better then the other 2 people).
While natalie didnt show anything, she said duringf the whole show ( from ep 1) that she is depending on russell and that she hopes russell doesnt backstab her and she never once said.. oh im using russell to get me in the end so i could win, meaning that wasnt her plan, and she said on the after shwo live that she was using russell.. when in reality we all know she wasnt, she had no strategy, she had no plan, she was just depending on russell.
Russell should have won survivor!
This is completely B.S., some girl that Russell carried to the top won, why? CAUSE THE FU*KING JURIES hated Russell and vote on Emotions, not how they play..
He played the game brialliantly, the best i ever seen on Survivor, he was smart, he wasnt afraid to make dangerous moves, he tricked alot of people. He shouldav won it.
I'm happy hes rich in real life.. but still he shouldav won... Im glad he won the Player of the season award, even the viewers thought he was the best.
Even the HOST of SURVIVOR thought Russel shouldav won...
http://www.pbpulse.com/tv/survivor/2009/12/22/probst-russell-shouldve-won-survivor/
Clearly not everyone thought Natalie White should’ve won Survivor. Count among the doubters one Jeff Probst.
Probst, the host of the CBS reality juggernaut, wrote on Entertainment Weekly’s PopWatch blog that he believed Russell Hantz should’ve received the $1 million first prize on Sunday night instead of Natalie.
Probst wrote: “Oftentimes on Survivor, the vote does come down to a choice where a determining factor is ‘how nice someone is’ but that’s usually when all other criteria being considered is equal. That doesn’t hold up this season. This season was so lopsided in terms of one person (Russell) completely dominating the game that to not give him the money and the title is a bit silly.”
Probst, who also serves as producer on the show, said the audience of the show spoke loudly when they voted Russell their favorite player by a large margin.
But the reason why Russell didn’t win, Probst surmised, was due to a “jury of bitter people”: “I do not believe the jury voted for Natalie, I believe the jury voted against Russell.”