uncle peet


UnclePeet is a large troublemaker and uses profane examples in his post. In one post: https://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/i-am-losing-touch-with-my-son-because-of-chess?page=4 I argued that hitting children is not ok at all using valid evidence to prove my point, and because I told UnclePeet that I don't think violence is an answer, here is how he responded: Mods, if you read this. this is pure evidence that UnclePeet violates alot of the Community Policies: https://www.chess.com/legal/community . In the screenshot, I was really attacked by how he dared bring Nazism to prove his point, and he only makes it worse by calling me a weakling. This is wrong in every way, and I hope that you mods can empathize and understand what is actually going on.


There's a way of proving someone wrong without insults or including Nazism.

Good taste in politicians and fine wine
Plus I hear he makes weak and sensitive people angry
That’s always a plus

What part of that is insulting to you? Can you be more specific instead of simply pasting an entire reply?
And I said specific….son…..not “all of it”

Or is it only me that we need to try and enforce this holy doctrine against?

maybe both of you just have different opinions but, I think, you can both share your opinions without feeling attacked
I mean if you attack someone's opinion you attack an opinion and not the person :) at least I prefer to see it that way
