uncle peet

Sort:
UnclePeet
Sure it is

Explain why then you called Mark a sycophant and it’s significance

I mean he asked you why and you responded
UnclePeet
I know I know you missed me
UnclePeet
“You make it interesting, don’t shy away from difficult situations in arguments, and make it interesting by not shying away from making your point.”

The only positive thing he said

Of that is sycophantic you have issues
UnclePeet
By the way…tell your BUDDY that “per capita” CO2 emissions mean JACK SQUAT….especially considering America produces most of the worlds food with those emissions which China produces little toy robots with blinking lights that break after an hour of playing with them
UnclePeet
Calling countries' total emissions "meaningless" because they're not measured per capita is ignoring the reality of the problem. Qatar—the worst per-capita offender—could go carbon-neutral tomorrow and climate change would march on unaffected, because China is still responsible for the lion's share of the CO₂ emissions.
China's emissions (and India's, for that matter) are only low per capita because of how many people they have living in relative poverty. I wouldn't say this is a statistic to be proud of.
Woollensock2
Mods can you please lock 🔐 this thread !
UnclePeet
Oh here we go with the thread lock again….why?

Should they lock your threads for being mindless and meaningless?
StumpyBlitzer

Tos broken please don't call anyone out and alot of TOS broken posts. 

This forum topic has been locked