Daily games is not real chess. It's rating is irrelevant to chess skills. 

Having a decent position out of the opening is irrelevant if you drop a rook as soon as you leave book.  At an 800 level, it's pointless to know your favourite lines ten moves deep, as your opponents aren't going to know those lines and follow them that deep.  At an 800 level, you don't need a +0.3 advantage out of the opening.

At that level, all you need from your opening is to avoid some traps and reach a playable middlegame.  General opening principles will get you 99% of that without learning much in the way of specific moves.  So learn some opening principles (develop your pieces, control the center, etc.), and then work on tactics.

Once you reach 1400 or so, you can start to dabble in openings a bit more, but even so your main focus should be tactics.

At that level, you should try to lay opening traps for your opponents and watch out for their traps.

Relying on traps will get you some cheap easy wins against low-rated players, but it won't work against stronger players who will see through the threat.  If your strategy relies on those traps, you'll beat up on the weak players, but you'll struggle to improve beyond that level.

Well, this thread is about how to score against low-rated players... 

You make some fine points here, particularly in regard to applying general opening principles rather than specific lines of study, but to be fair one naturally develops into the other.

And while you're right that opening won't help you if you drop a rook on move 11 or whatever, the advice there is simple... make sure the square you're planning on moving to is not attacked by the enemy. You can only tell people this, you can't teach them how to do it because it's obvious... look at the board, look at his pieces.

If you're low rated because you drop rooks, then all you need to do to improve is look at where the enemy pieces are attacking.

Personally, my rating improved a great deal when I started to cross reference my planned opening moves with a database. From the superior positions I found myself in, I was able to find much better attacking lines, and was able to maintain my defence better. Admittedly I was rated around 1400 when I started to study my openings, but I was up to 1800 rather quickly and have since crept past 1900.

I've never been rated as low as 800, apart from maybe when I was a kid playing against adults, so I don't really know what you can do to improve from there, other than to remember to look at what your enemy is doing. That's how I lost so much as a kid... by only concerning myself with my plans.

You started studying openings at 1400ish - that's probably a good level to do so.  But when you're 800, you're not losing games because you don't have a superior position coming out of the opening.  When you're 800, you're losing games because you blunder material every third move, and miss much of the free material that your opponents are blundering.

Simply stopping blundering material quite as often and taking more of the free material your opponents give you is by far the easiest way for an 800-rated player to improve.

Youre only allowed 1 account.

git gud

have fun doing tactics and look out for free pieces u nub.

Quit

This will have been said but - learn from each game.  

And every move.

...and watch the other guys eyes 

@op You might find this usefull.

The Principles of the Opening -- for Beginners!

https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-principles-of-the-opening

try to be a strong player in your league(800) then you will improve and will step into 900 club then try strong there. I was under 900 in bullet regularly but now I am over 1000 minimum and if i reached under 1000 i quickly get points in 900 league and enter the 1000 league ...it was a dream months ago. You can be good too

Yeah, but half of them will involve illegal moves.

 Most of Jacob Aagaard's books are much too advanced for a beginner.

I am not suggesting that the book is not good.  However, the book is certainly appropriate for those rated at your level, not for beginners...

Hello. I was in Antalya last summer and it is beautiful.

Play "960 chess" - your opponents won't have memorised any openings so you do not worry about opening traps. "Mindy's 960 Chess Club" is good.

Well, actually it is a very good idea. I am gonna try that. BTW I am living in Istanbul, if you come to Turkey again, let me know!

This is an interesting thread. As a total newbie to chess, I played a little with friends and got a little better then played some blitz games on here and got destroyed by other players. My rating is super low right now. I agree that slowing down and thinking it through is definitely great advice. It's similar to learning guitar...speed comes from accuracy. 

I love the tactics trainer on here but find given how heavily into account it takes time to solve, it's almost like you have to be prepared to stay on a low rating if you want to take the time to think each position through. You can either guess and maybe get +12, or think it through and get +1. What's more important for patzers? Learning the actual tactic, I guess. The rating comes later when you speed up.

Something I find REALLY helpful is playing the computer on Coach Mode. At first, it's good to give you hints on best moves, and after a while those moves and thought processes start to become second nature.