No one will see this, but it has to be said anyway. You all have so much in terms of resources, and you're using them in the realm of engine tournaments by running one match at a time, with insane computing power behind it, instead of running a hundred at a time and presenting the statistics. You not only have the capability of building the internet's premiere rating list, but you have the ability to host tournaments with titled players and engines that they can actually beat -- which would give us anchors for a chess engine rating list. Chesscom could single-handedly change the face of engine testing by locking in engine ratings according to how they relate to human players. There is *so much* potential here that's just being wasted. Feel free to ignore what I'm saying, as per usual.
No one will see this, but it has to be said anyway. You all have so much in terms of resources, and you're using them in the realm of engine tournaments by running one match at a time, with insane computing power behind it, instead of running a hundred at a time and presenting the statistics. You not only have the capability of building the internet's premiere rating list, but you have the ability to host tournaments with titled players and engines that they can actually beat -- which would give us anchors for a chess engine rating list. Chesscom could single-handedly change the face of engine testing by locking in engine ratings according to how they relate to human players. There is *so much* potential here that's just being wasted. Feel free to ignore what I'm saying, as per usual.