I had the (basic) computer analyze Fischer's Game of Century. The results were unexpected.

THIS is quite the shock. After Fischer's move, the computer NOW says black is up a slightly over a point. It says that this isn't brilliant, but just the best move!? It then suggests an alternative that gives an equal position?! This should clearly be a brilliant move, but the analysis (basic) wont recognize it. Here is some other weird analysis. The computer classifies Fischer's rook check as a blunder, but then I decided to look into the computer's "best" line. Here the "best" move is played for black. And now after just one move, this line is said to be .2 better than Fischer's move. Perhaps the rook move was an inaccuracy, but certainly not a blunder. This is another weird analysis, the computer says taking the queen is an inaccuracy, but the following position (below) follows after white plays the "best" or forced moved. Here we are after the "best" and forcing moves for white (after white took the queen). The position is now much worse for white. Thus taking the queen should be classified as a blunder.

Now a big disclaimer, I am only a basic member, so I only used the basic analysis. That said, the basic analysis.

1. Failed to recognize one of the greatest moves in chess history as a brilliant move, despite the move clearly being the best and hard for it to find.

2. Incorrectly identified a non-blunder as a blunder. 

3. Identified a blunder as an inaccuracy. 

As this is the case, I believe the analysis for basic users should be improved.