I have to wait 24 hours to review the SAME GAME again?

Sort:
ClownCircus

I get it, chesscom. You want people to pay you, to analyze their games with the "Open Source" stockfish program that you use. But you could at least make an effort to the players who can't afford a membership.


I just reviewed my game, with my "1 review per day" blessing from chesscom gods. And I accidentally refreshed the page and now I have to wait 24 hours to review THE SAME GAME again. It was much simpler before, when analyze and review was the same thing. You guys are breaking the perfectly good website with your every touch.

 

justbefair
ClownCircus wrote:

I get it, chesscom. You want people to pay you, to analyze their games with the "Open Source" stockfish program that you use. But you could at least make an effort to the players who can't afford a membership.


I just reviewed my game, with my "1 review per day" blessing from chesscom gods. And I accidentally refreshed the page and now I have to wait 24 hours to review THE SAME GAME again. It was much simpler before, when analyze and review was the same thing. You guys are breaking the perfectly good website with your every touch.

 

 

It doesn't appear that you have reviewed any games recently. (I was going to rerun it for you.)

ClownCircus

This one was the game I reviewed. I wanted to see if my rook sacrifice was a brilliant. Review said I didn't have a brilliant but I had 2 great moves. If I hadn't analyzed this game, I wouldn't know this, right? After I refreshed the page, it started saying that I used my daily game review for the day.

 

justbefair

Here is the computer analysis of your most recent loss:

 

justbefair

Yes, that one had a sacrifice.  Any decent sacrifice is called "brilliant" under the definitions they put in last year.

/  It's not simply printing out the Stockfish analysis. 

ClownCircus
justbefair wrote:

 

Yes, that one had a sacrifice.  Any decent sacrifice is called "brilliant" under the definitions they put in last year.

 

Thanks! I hope they can solve this issue though. Very frustrating to lose your only review in 24 hours just because of a page refresh.

justbefair
ClownCircus wrote:
justbefair wrote:

 

Yes, that one had a sacrifice.  Any decent sacrifice is called "brilliant" under the definitions they put in last year.

 

Thanks! I hope they can solve this issue though. Very frustrating to lose your only review in 24 hours just because of a page refresh.

Hmm.   But it is a website.   That is how the internet works.  When you clicked "refresh",  you were asking the website to do something...

 

Martin_Stahl

It should have saved the analysis, so it's possible that a bug was introduced. Something like that has happened in the past.