The standard "Reinfeld" 1-3-3-5-9 piece values are used on this site, but this article shows these numbers are not accurate and can lead to a variety of mistakes. https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-evaluation-of-material-imbalances-by-im-larry-kaufman
For example it is common for players to trade a knight and a bishop for a rook and a pawn because those 1-3-3-5-9 values imply it is an even trade when two minor pieces are usually worth more than a rook and a pawn.
Is there interest in giving users the option of changing from 1-3-3-5-9 numbers to an alternative piece valuation system, such as the Kaufman average piece values?
Learning such things is part of advancing in chess.
But where would that be useful to chess.com users?
In the computer evaluations?
I assume that modern computer engines incorporate those nuances and that they update piece values based on the position.
The standard "Reinfeld" 1-3-3-5-9 piece values are used on this site, but this article shows these numbers are not accurate and can lead to a variety of mistakes. https://www.chess.com/article/view/the-evaluation-of-material-imbalances-by-im-larry-kaufman
For example it is common for players to trade a knight and a bishop for a rook and a pawn because those 1-3-3-5-9 values imply it is an even trade when two minor pieces are usually worth more than a rook and a pawn.
Is there interest in giving users the option of changing from 1-3-3-5-9 numbers to an alternative piece valuation system, such as the Kaufman average piece values?