Using chess script
Yes, a person can play 210 games simultaneously without resorting to "chess scripts". Some players have maintained more than a thousand games, players of unblemished reputation and good character. They do not take four minutes to move, try ten seconds.
Your accusations are baseless (the guy has more losses than wins!) and should finish here.
1. I don't believe your statement: "Some players have maintained more than a thousand games" I will apologise if you prove your words.I´d traced top players before starting the post I've not found anyone yet even who plays 100 at the same time.
2. It can't be 10 seconds as site works not to quickly and sometimes it takes 3-7 seconds to browse the game image.If you consider it is enough for him 5 seconds to analyse the situation, refresh in his mind the combination of current game and make a move, then he should really be a genius. I believe there are such persons. But then the statistics as you've noted should be completely different.
What do the other think?
1. FM Kacparov and AWARDCHESS both maintained more than a thousand games for a long time, both are beyond reproach.
2. It does not take 3-7 seconds to load a page if you have a decent machine and a good connection, mine load practically instantaneously.
Wind your neck in newbie, you have no idea what you are talking about.
FMKacparov had 1,200 going at once several months ago. He was a mere 14 years old at the time. He's got 419 in progress right now. Just checked
Davy, if you set a goal to convince me that there are persons who can play hundreds of games simultaneously, then you have already convinced me in it. To tell the truth I'd known it without your uninformative comment.
The question was: if exactly this player use scripts, any other progs or not. For analyses and proving of your mind you can use his statistics, style of playing, his rating and rating of rivals for playing. Or you can tell that your opponent is newbie and has no idea what one is talking about it is much, it much more easier of course.
P.S. Will examplify for clearness.
The record for long jump is 9 meters but you will mistrust if your newborough announces that he jumps 7 meters.
Yes I see, Woodshover, Kacparov's really a genious. My delight!
[COMMENT DELETED] (by me) because it had served its purpose.
P.S. Will examplify for clearness.
The record for long jump is 9 meters but you will mistrust if your neuborough announces thajump 7 meters.
Seriously? you think that's clearer?
Just so I know what's going on here: Is English your first language?
Edited the comment, sorry for mispellings.
No, not the first.
The record for long jump is 9 meters but you will mistrust if your newborough announces that he jumps 7 meters.
Again, your arithmetic is false.
Taking Kacparov as the comparison (other players have had many more games), your example player has one-sixth as many games.
So, I would not be surprised if my neighbour jumped 1.5 metres.
Perhaps I really got a jerk into conсlusion.
Though it doesn't meant that my doubts are groundless.
But my apologises you really proved the existence of such persons. Hope that I was right, otherwise I could offend discussed person.
i think someone is using a translation script...
What's a "chess script?"
Perhaps I really got a jerk into conсlusion.
Though it doesn't meant that my doubts are groundless.
But my apologises you really proved the existence of such persons. Hope that I was right, otherwise I could offend discussed person.
I don't think that you understood that some people are properly addicted to the act of moving in chess games. Their practices are beyond reason for most of us and yet they do exist.
Enjoy your chess. 
I'd still like to know what a chess script is, please.
i'd like to know as well please, i'm also a newbie , id also like to know from someone who plays so many games at once, do you open the same way in all your white games, or do you mix it up ?
I can barely manage double digits.
well i am just playing one game at the moment, the idea of 100+ games in front of me would have me befuddled i'm sure. I have seen a trick on tv ,where a man of a higher than average chess ability took on 10 chess masters simultaneously in a circle , alternate black and white,. He won a couple and drew a couple , which is amazing , but the trick was that he was just imitating the moves that were being played against him , how one master attacked him was how he attacked another. He obviously could play chess, but nowhere near the standard of the masters and should have lost all 10, i was gobsmacked till he said how he did it, then it made sense.
I can barely manage double digits.
well i am just playing one game at the moment, the idea of 100+ games in front of me would have me befuddled i'm sure. I have seen a trick on tv ,where a man of a higher than average chess ability took on 10 chess masters simultaneously in a circle , alternate black and white,. He won a couple and drew a couple , which is amazing , but the trick was that he was just imitating the moves that were being played against him , how one master attacked him was how he attacked another. He obviously could play chess, but nowhere near the standard of the masters and should have lost all 10, i was gobsmacked till he said how he did it, then it made sense.
I believe that man was Derren Brown, if you were wondering.